We have been waiting decades for Hillary Clinton to say something about her husband who raped and sexually assaulted numerous women and she finally addressed the subject. The woman who ran on a campaign that sexual assault victims have a right to be believed never once believed the victims of her own husband, blaming it all on a “vast right-wing conspiracy.” On Friday she was asked about Bill’s hobby of forcing himself on women and she settled the matter by saying that it was all in the past and therefore not relevant.
Hillary did an interview with the BBC and the subject of Democratic Party megadonor Harvey Weinstein and his sexual harassment and rape scandal came up. Of course Hillary tried to downplay the disgusting behavior of this man who had put so many millions of dollars in her pocket and make it all about President Trump:
“But I think it’s important that we not just focus on [Weinestein] and whatever consequences flow from these stories about his behavior, but that we recognize this kind of behavior cannot be tolerated anywhere, whether it’s in entertainment, politics. After all, we have someone admitting to being a sexual assaulter in the Oval Office,” said Hillary.
Really? When did Trump admit to being a sexual assaulter? She’s obviously referring to the Access Hollywood tape where Trump said that because he is famous women let him do whatever he wants to them. Women letting Trump do things is them consenting. I know words are hard for liberals, but even Hillary knows this is a lie. And it’s as dishonest as comparing Trump to Weinstein, who has done all kinds of terrible things to women against their will.
That was some vintage Hillary bullshitting, but this interview had much more to give. The interviewer in his very British way basically asked, “Yo, what about Bill and dem women he raped?”
“That has all been litigated. That was subject of a huge investigation in the late ’90s and there were conclusions drawn. That was clearly in the past,” said Hillary with a smile.
I’m not even kidding about this, watch the video, she thinks her answer is funny somehow.
So Bill’s rapes are in the past so they are no longer relevant? The Access Hollywood tape was from 2005. Isn’t that also in the past? Come to think of it, Harvey Weinstein hasn’t yet groped or raped anyone in the future, so his disgusting behavior is additionally in the past tense.
This is some brilliant Clintonian logic. If you did something bad in the past, as all Clintons have, it can’t be held against you now because that was such a long time ago. It’s why she doesn’t think Whitewater, Vince Foster, Benghazi, her private e-mail server, or dozens of other transgressions should have been campaign issues, let alone criminal matters.
Unfortunately this rule only applies to people with the last name Clinton and possibly other rich liberal assholes. You can’t get off for robbing a liquor store by telling the judge, “Man, that happened like two months ago. How it is even relevant now?”
Word is that Hillary Clinton is considering a teaching position at an Ivy League school. If she’s is teaching a class on being full of shit, we finally have found something where she really is the most qualified person for the job.