When Dianne Feinstein leaked a letter accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, that she sat on for 6 weeks, just prior to his confirmation vote, she knew what she was doing. The California Senator knew that the allegations were bullshit and couldn’t be proven, but she wanted to get Kavanaugh convicted in the eyes of the public. Lucky for her, the liberal media is playing along like she figured and has now declared Kavanaugh guilty of these unfounded accusations. Feinstein doesn’t come off as all that bright, but she is a calculating devious super-villain.
Christine Blasey Ford has accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her in the early 1980’s. She doesn’t know exactly when this happened, where it happened, or why she was there. She has no witnesses to corroborate her story and she won’t testify under oath about any of these allegations. Under normal circumstances, this lack of evidence and unwillingness to cooperate add up to a dead story: It never happened and she is full of shit. But these aren’t normal circumstances because democrats are trying desperately to stop a well-qualified jurist from being appointed to the Supreme Court.
The liberal media, as the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party, is doing their part to prop up this baseless accusation by declaring Brett Kavanaugh guilty of these crimes. Here’s ABC’s chief political analyst Matthew Dowd with what has to be at least two cases of slander:
It was despicable and outrageous what happened to Anita Hill more than 25 years ago, and a sexual predator was given a lifetime seat on the SC. Let’s hope history doesn’t repeat itself in 2018.
— Matthew Dowd (@matthewjdowd) September 17, 2018
You got that? In Matthew Dowd’s “unbiased” analysis, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is a sexual predator and so is Brett Kavanaugh. Neither of these men has been convicted or charged with sexual assault, but Dowd has declared them both sexual predators. Neither Thomas nor Kavanaugh has even been credibly accused of sexual assault.
Which brings us to New York magazine who says this:
If Kavanaugh is confirmed, two out of nine justices on the United States Supreme Court — a full third of the male justices — will have been credibly accused of doing serious harm to women and given lifetime appointments anyway.
Credibly accused? Remember, Ford won’t give the slightest details of her accusation that could be checked out to determine if there is any truth to her claims. She also will not testify under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee which is an indication that she is lying. This is actually the complete opposite of a credible accusation.
By calling Ford’s allegations credible, New York magazine is saying that there is mountain of evidence that Brett Kavanaugh did indeed sexual assault her when no such evidence exists. In other words, this is another liberal media outlet that has convicted Kavanaugh of this crime.
It’s not a coincidence that the liberal media is drawing parallels between Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas. In 1991, when Thomas was nominated by George Bush Sr. the democrats pulled the same kind of dirty trick.Thomas’ confirmation hearings were complete when all of a sudden the democrats rolled out Anita Hill who accused the judge of sexual harassment. Her accusation was equally devoid of proof, but Thomas’ reputation took a hit. Sound familiar?
Feinstein and the democrats obviously looked at the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill debacle and figured it almost worked once, so why not give it another go?